Dosing and Judgment in Horse Races

horse race

You can use the Internet to watch horse races. There are many major races and you can click on a hyperlink to learn more about the horses and trainers that have won. This can also give you insight into any rules violations. The following article will go over some of the important aspects of horse races, including dosing and judgment. If you have an interest in horse racing, you can also read up on the major rules in horse racing and how to make use of them.

Dosage diagram for horse race

A Dosage Diagram for horse races can help you determine the odds of multiple wins for a horse. This chart lists five figures in the order of performance and allows you to determine a horse’s expected performance in a particular race. For instance, Secretariat had a Dosage Profile of 20-14-7-9-0, which was divided by the number of runs the horse has made. If the horse runs more than five times, its Dosage Diagram will be different from the last two figures.

The Dosage Diagram shows the relationship between speed and stamina. A horse with a CD between -2 and +2 has potential to run further than others. Conversely, a horse with a CD that is decreasing indicates that it isn’t very fast and will struggle to stay on the lead. On the other hand, a rising CD indicates that the horse will run further and might even lead the race.


Judges may reverse a judgment in a horse race if there is a pattern of unpaid debts. During the proceedings of a Pegasus race, for example, a transcript of the case indicated that the Winner owed Stable multiple amounts for various services rendered to the horse. The judgment, however, did not require the Winner to testify or refute the allegations. The Board may also remove employees of a licensee or its officials from the track for their dishonest behavior.

A thorough examination of the evidence in this case reveals that Sandstrom’s claim is based on an additional ground that invalidates the rule. He argues that rule 313 represents an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. While rule 313 may have a sound basis in statute, the evidence fails to establish that the board of horse racing had the power to prescribe rules on horse racing. As such, Sandstrom is seeking a reversal of the decision in his favor.

Suspension for infraction of rules

The penalties stipulated by the Commission for violations of its rules and statutes are set forth in WAC 260-70-690. A penalty of suspension means exclusion from race meetings, grounds, or privileges. When two penalties are imposed for the same offense, the stricter one prevails. If there is a dispute about the violation of the rules, the racing commission will refer the case to a judge for further proceedings.

In some cases, a participant’s infraction of the rules could lead to his horse’s disqualification. If the offending driver is disciplined for wrongly attempting to affect the race’s result, the penalty will be monetary. The driver can also be suspended for violating the rules by intentionally hindering the running of another horse or committing cruelty to the animal. While a suspension may not mean disqualification, a fine of $1,000 or even a one-year suspension can be imposed.

Comments are closed.